[ProfessionalDevelopment 1839] From Emily, Is ProfessionalDevelopmentaccountable?Taylor, Jackie jataylor at utk.eduMon Jan 7 16:50:23 EST 2008
The following post is from Emily Miller Payne, please read on...Jackie Taylor ================================================================== I agree with David and Renee about the need for systematic accountability of the effect of professional development on the field of adult education. I concur that the field needs to fund projects in order to develop processes for determining accountability. Accountability in professional development needs to be a priority at the national level if we want it to be respected and valued. That said, Texas has made some important first steps in addressing the disconnect between adult education professional development and the impact it has on teacher quality and ultimately on the success of their students. Initially, in the mid to late 1990s, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) began funding systematic professional development through a state-wide consortium of PD providers. Additionally, TEA funded a 5-year project to develop an adult educator credential model; staff on that project developed content areas based on input from the field and the literature, developed strategies and options for teachers to access professional development, and conducted a pilot and field test of the model. All of this field work was done prior to TEA's discontinuation funding for the PD consortium and the credential project. In 2003, TEA (Texas LEARNS) again funded a system of adult education PD through a series of regional professional development centers (called the Regional GREAT Centers of Excellence), and they once again funded the adult education credential project as a companion program to the centers. At this point, in the absence of a set of practitioner standards, the credential project, with PD support from the regional centers, does offer a systematic and (relatively) standardized way for Texas teachers to participate in focused and sustained PD. Teachers pursuing the Texas teacher credential use individually developed PD plans and have the latitude to use a variety of resources and activities. Under the Texas model, teachers apply the knowledge and/or skills they learned; evaluate the effects following the implementation of the knowledge and/or skills in their classrooms; and submit written reflections that focus on the instructional outcomes following implementation of newly acquired knowledge and/or skills. This effort represents an initial step that is necessary in order to begin building a standardized accountability system for evaluating adult education professional development. What we lack is long term research into the impact of professional development on teacher quality and the subsequent effect of professional development on student progress. Although this research isn't funded at this point, Texas adult educators and state leaders are mindful of the need to evaluate the impact of teacher PD on student learning, and professionals across the state continue to discuss ways to fund projects to conduct such research. Here in Texas, we are fortunate to have state leaders (Joanie Rethlake and Federico Salas) who support our efforts by funding regional PD centers and the credential project. We continue to look forward to a time when a fair, equitable, and reliable accountability system for professional development will be implemented. For a look at the six core content areas and other details of the Texas teacher credential, visit the website at: http://www.tei.education.txstate.edu/credential/ Emily Miller Payne ep02 at txstate.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20080107/36700a6e/attachment.html
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list |