[ProfessionalDevelopment 2148] Re: Program-based PD your thoughtsjhalaesl at aol.com jhalaesl at aol.comTue May 27 08:49:06 EDT 2008
I often present at Adult Literacy conferences and workshops. One of the first questions I ask participants is how many of them have attended a workshop, given a positive evaluation, then gone home and put the workshop binder on the shelf, never to be used again. Lots of hands raise and heads nod. To overcome at least some of this disconnect between training and implementation, we offer training in an instructors classroom with her/his students. The first session is usually a demo by the trainer in that setting. The follow up includes post-class discussion, then a second visit by the trainer to observe the instructor implementing newly learned techniques. Because we maintain a "share the wealth of knowledge" attitude, there is less pressure on the instructors to "perform" then return to old teaching ways. For newer or less diversified instructors, the introduction of new techniques can be customized to their level of experience and openness to "innovation." Joanne Hala The Jointure Community Education * Child Enrichment * Adult Literacy www.jointure.org (908) 872-9573 1124 Rt 202 South, B-11 Raritan NJ 08869 -----Original Message----- From: Katrina Hinson <khinson at almanid.com> To: professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov Sent: Sun, 25 May 2008 1:08 pm Subject: [ProfessionalDevelopment 2146] Re: Program-based PD your thoughts I happen to agree with Robin's comments. Program -PD is only as effective as policy and personnel (administrators) require it to be. When it is not supported it tends to be wasted effort - especially when the PD does not have an impact on classroom teaching practices or student performance goals. I think Robin hit the nail on the head when she said it evaporates when teachers know they don't "HAVE" to continue doing what they were trained to do. I think one obstacle that leads to this isn't so much teacher turnover ( though that is a big one) but also, administrative apathy. Training is done because they feel they have to not because they want to and then they don't have time to truly dedicate to find out if the training was effective or being utilized and then teachers feel like they wasted their time or that the training was pointless. My favorite comment from teachers is that "I've always done it this way" as if that is the only way something can be done - or when someone looks at me and tells me they thought it was 'interesting and cute' but you can tell from their comments that he/she has no intention of ever truly implementing what they have just been trained on. For PD to be effective, everyone has to support it and understand the need and essentialness or inter-relatedness of all the pieces - from the training to the classroom to the assessment to student performance. Regards, Katrina Hinson >>> <robinschwarz1 at aim.com> 5/15/2008 4:06:47 pm >>> Mariann and list-- I find that the most important element of all is policy change at the program level. Without that, all the effort soon evaporates either as teachers know they don''t HAVE to continue doing what they were trained to do, or because there is staff turnover and the effort is lost.?? Robin Lovrien Schwarz -----Original Message----- From: Mariann Fedele <MariannF at lacnyc.org> To: The Adult Literacy Professional Development Discussion List <professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov> Sent: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:49 pm Subject: [ProfessionalDevelopment 2133] Program-based PD your thoughts Hello PD list colleagues, Program-based PD is becoming a topic of great interest and growing practice in the world of adult education. What do you think are some of the key resources/tools/examples anyone interested in this topic should know about? For those of you who have conducted program-based PD what have been the benefits and what have been the challenges? If the sky were the limit, what do you think would help in meeting the challenges (trainings, technology supports, tailored technical assistance)? Look forward to hearing from you soon! Mariann Mariann Fedele Director, NYC Regional Adult Education Network Literacy Assistance Center Moderator, NIFL Technology and Literacy Discussion List 32 Broadway 10th Floor New York, New York 10004 212-803-3325 mariannf at lacnyc.org www.lacnyc.org ---------------------------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Adult Literacy Professional Development mailing list professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/professionaldevelopment Provide feedback by May 30th on the AALPD Quality Professional Development Standards: http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/AALPD_PD_Quality_Standards_Feedback Professional Development section of the Adult Literacy Education Wiki http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/Adult_Literacy_Professional_Development ---------------------------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Adult Literacy Professional Development mailing list professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/professionaldevelopment Provide feedback by May 30th on the AALPD Quality Professional Development Standards: http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/AALPD_PD_Quality_Standards_Feedback Professional Development section of the Adult Literacy Education Wiki http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/Adult_Literacy_Professional_Development -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20080527/04b60ccf/attachment.html
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list |