
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[PD 4131] Re: When are teachers condescending?
Bonnie Odiorne
bonniesophia at sbcglobal.netWed Nov 4 09:43:00 EST 2009
- Previous message: [PD 4130] When are teachers condescending?
- Next message: [PD 4137] Fully-Funded International Opportunity for U.S. Teachers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Tatanya, I would like to add that all too often, on the university level where I am (albeit to many remediation students) the province of language is "English" and then there's all the rest of the courses, all of which require that students write well, know how to paraphrase, and each discipline has its own conception of what good writing and format are. And if they don't well, it's the English language teachers' "fault." As long as language teaching (or writing) remains only the province of the "English classes," students won't realize that good writing is essential everywhere, and can differ according to content area (of course, not to mention that many other disciplines can enter reading and writing material for English classes). A student complaining about the number of English classes they now have to take, asked "how much English do we have to take to really be able to use it for our jobs?" I answered, "as much as you can get." But
there is no real boundary in specialist areas when one begin to think in an "across the disciplines" kind of model. Learning grammar anf mechanics in a vacuum, on the one hand, and expecting students in content areas to already have grammar and mechanics that are appropriate to that discipline, on the other, are both unfortunate ways of thinking about the connections we all have to deal with.
Bonnie Odiorne, PhD Director, Writing Center Adjunct Professor of English, French, First Year Transitions, Day Division and ADP
Post University, Waterbury, CT
Labyrinth Facilitator, Spiritual Director
please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
________________________________
From: Tanya Exum <tanya_ex at hotmail.com>
To: professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov
Sent: Tue, November 3, 2009 6:09:25 PM
Subject: [PD 4130] When are teachers condescending?
Steve,
I would like to address your thought:
"I think that the teaching of these disciplines should be left to specialists, and left to programs which are clearly identified as being about philosophy or political economy or Marxism or whatever. To attempt to teach these under the guise of language teaching can be condescending, in the sense that it is more about showing off than achieving the specific pedagogical goal of improving language skills."
I would like to respectfully note that teaching expressive language is _impossible_ without including such issues as philosophy, political economy, etc., especially when we are speaking about adult population. Everything depends on _how_.
There is nothing wrong with introducing various, sometimes complicated issues, provided the preliminary stages have been covered, it's not a totally new topic, and it is relevant to the subject area.
What we find out through serving ABE-GED students, is deficiency in analysing, and, especially, synthesising skills. These are the skills which are required to pass multiple tests, from FCAT to GED and by workforce. GED Social Studies and Science largely depend on the ability of the students to analyze information, which is in front of them, and give a synthezied answer (Reading Comprehension). A lot of our adults have not been taught or did not obtain these skills due to various reasons, therefore, it is critical to teach them _how_. Therefore, teaching language skills _within_ the parameters of the subjects, which might as well include philosophical issues, Marxism (World Wars I and II, Cold War in GED Social Studies), reduces the gap between language skills and subject area skills.
Same can be said about Writing. The GED scoring system correlates written expression in a form of free writing and a multiple choice. Students who score high on multiple choice (language mechanics skills), may fail overall Writing due to inability to adequately answer the essay prompt (again, analyzing and synthesizing).
Teaching students mechanics of language and leaving the rest to them, relying on the common adult sense, may sometimes become couterproductive, unless it is just a survival level.
Tatyana Exum
________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook updates, right from Hotmail®.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20091104/c4e0e7e2/attachment.html
- Previous message: [PD 4130] When are teachers condescending?
- Next message: [PD 4137] Fully-Funded International Opportunity for U.S. Teachers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment discussion list



