What do we include into the term _knowledge_? Subject area knowledge? Cross-curriculum knowledge?

 

In 1993, I had a very interesting educational experience. The State University of Physical Culture and Sports (Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine) decided to open a new degree program: Sports' Physiology. Students, who were active sportsmen, were being prepared to be sports doctors, with significant proficiency in English Language.  To assist in developing the degree  program, the Department of Foreign Languages decided to help in a form of issuing the multilingual (Greek/Roman/German/English/French) classroom dictionary of the cross curriculum terminology.   I, as an editor, had to deal with subject area specialists. At first, there was a lot of resistance ( "I am teaching Chemistry; it's the linguist's job", or "You, theorists, are so far from real life..."), but in the process, through debates and discussion of various approaches, in which our students were included, we reached consesus that dictionaries, which were compliled by linguists, who were not specialists in the specific "knowledge" field, might be misleading, and, in the end, detrimental for somebody's life. Our students became our front-line editors. Creating the dictionary helped _all of us_ to walk in each other's shoes and expend our knowledge.

 

Would this be the example of the knowledge which was referred to?

 

There is no doubt in my mind that including students into the thought process, into the meaningful reading, far exceeds 

the volume of reading.

 

Tatyana Exum

SpEd Instructor

Lake City Correctional Facility

Lake City

 

 

 

  

 

 

 


 

> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:59:38 -0500

> From: Janet_Isserlis at brown.edu

> To: professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov

> Subject: When are colleagues condescending?

> 

> Steve and all

> 

> You offer a solution - or a means towards - assisting students in learning more and gaining inspiration. It's an interesting observation. However, to posit that it is *the* solution, to this reader, feels exactly like what "condescending" feels like.

> 

> You've offered a solution, an interesting one, worth consideration. But there are others. For me, discussion and dialogue come screeching to a halt when a discussant offers just the one option. Where else can a conversation go?

> 

> Janet Isserlis

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: professionaldevelopment-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Steve Kaufmann

> Sent: Wed 11/4/2009 2:03 AM

> To: Catherine B. King; The Adult Literacy Professional Development Discussion List

> Subject: [PD 4135] Re: When are teachers condescending?

> 

> I have the feeling that the reason many students appear to Catherine to be "

> "deficient, uncritical, insufficiently inspired" in dealing with academic

> issues, is that they have not read very much. The solution is to

> encourage them

> to read more and increase their knowledge. Without this knowledge I do not

> believe that a language teacher can teach them "critical thinking".

> 

> Steve Kaufmann

> 604-922-8551

> <http://www.lingq.com/?referral=steve>

> <http://www.lingq.com/?referral=steve>

> 

> 

> <http://www.google.com/search?q=to%20>

> 

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook updates, right from Hotmail®.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_4:092009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20091106/cb46f608/attachment.html