
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[ProgramLeadership 56] Advisory Board/Student Input
Kim Chaney-Bay
kchaney at utk.eduFri May 12 10:22:18 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ProgramLeadership 55] Re: Shared plan time for teachers Reply
- Next message: [ProgramLeadership 57] Responses from guest
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dear Esmerelda,
In reading your story of the program improvement process at the Union City
Adult Learning Center, I have a couple of questions to ask....
(1) The first question regards the Advisory Board that were put together to
aid in this process. How often did the Advisory Board meet? Was it
monthly? If so, for how many months? Was there a smaller "core" group
that met to spend more time on certain parts of the program improvement
process (in addition to the teachers' weekly planning times)?
(2) The second question regards student input. You noted that students
gave input to Ms. Gabriella Ruiz, the Student Representative on the
board...could you describe that process a bit more (ie, did she interview
students, did students come to her voluntarily with feedback, etc.)?
Thank you,
Kim Chaney-Bay
- Previous message: [ProgramLeadership 55] Re: Shared plan time for teachers Reply
- Next message: [ProgramLeadership 57] Responses from guest
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ProgramLeadership discussion list



