[SpecialTopics 1022] Standards - Response to Questions by Allan FrenchAnderson, Philip Philip.Anderson at fldoe.orgThu Jun 19 12:37:21 EDT 2008
This is a response from Phil Anderson, Florida DOE Adult Education Program Specialist to the questions posed by Allan French, ESL Instructor, Assessment Coordinator, Norming Project Coordinator at South Seattle Community College: This statement made by Allan resonates strongly: "The new state standards were brought into the project to inform and suggest (especially in terms of language), not to limit and control." This is the intention of Florida's standards as well. Allan's questions: "I see standards as not just a guideline for a lesson, but a destination (after all, they define what we expect our students to know and be able to do as they exit a particular level). I am concerned with how we get to that destination, especially given the multitude of standards and indicators, the need for multiple types of assessment, and the time limitations. So I would like to ask all of you out there who have worked some time with standards, (1) how do you determine that a student is ready for the next level of an integrated ESL class, using standards? Florida has several adult ESOL courses that are funded only with state dollars, and are not reported to the NRS. Literacy Skills for the Adult ESOL Learner is one of these. In 1999-2000, this course was developed by a group of adult ESOL experts that included a University of Florida researcher in adult ESOL literacy, Dr. Edwidge Crevecoeur-Bryant, consultants with years of adult education experience in Florida, teachers, and Dr. Edwina Hoffman, a Miami-Dade program administrator of refugee programs. This course is designed for students that have low levels of education and literacy in their home language(s). Most students are Haitian, or from various language groups in Mexico and Central America, such as Mixteco, Tarasco, Quechua, and Kanjobal. This course has been put through implementation and revision stages in several schools around the state, and it has been tweaked almost yearly since its inception. It has a set of benchmarks that are divided into three levels, A, B, C. Last year, the state database shows that 13,794 students were enrolled in this course. We developed a "User Guide" for this course to explain to teachers how it is used and suggestions on how to teach the course. Documents related to this course can be found on the Florida Adult Education website, http://www.fldoe.org/workforce/adult_ed.asp. (2) How do you determine what constitutes satisfactory performance of any one standard/indicator, and that such performance has in fact been achieved? For the present, the only method the state prescribes is that the teacher of the course and the program administrator must sign off on a state-created "Progress Report" that indicates the student has "satisfactorily" mastered the benchmarks shown in the Progress in the standards. What is deemed "satisfactory" is left up to those two persons, the teacher and the program administrator. The state expects local programs to establish a written procedure for how the teachers will determine progress, i.e., portfolio, teacher-designed tests, textbook tests, worksheet samples, documentation of group projects, etc. After the teacher and administrator sign off on the student's Progress Report, the program sends notification to the state that the student mastered the standards. The state then records this in its database and assigns payment to the program accordingly. The local program is required to retain the records showing documentation of the progress report for auditing purposes. The state sends out monitors to all programs to check on the documentation of the progress reports. Since the Florida legislature funds this course through its adult education funding, the FL DOE, for now, uses this method of holding the program to a certain level of accountability. (3) How do you create the assessment tools to evaluate said performance? The state is in the process of exploring the development of a standardized procedure/assessment that can give us a reliable and valid way of measuring progress on the course standards. Hopefully within the next two years, this standardized procedure/assessment will be ready for use. (4) Can you cover all standards/indicators for the level in a single quarter or how much time is needed? Another way of asking this is how do you grapple with the, at times, mind-boggling complexity of all that we are endeavoring to do. Since the standards are "to inform and to suggest," teachers are not expected to cover 100% of the standards within an instructional period of time, but to judiciously select those that are relevant. Maxine McCormick, a Florida trainer, often exhorts us, "Take your students to MMU! Teach them what is meaningful, memorable and useful!" Several Florida programs are piloting short terms of 8 weeks in a "managed enrollment" system with some of their classes. In these classes, students are assigned to a class by level, the class is "closed" after the second week, and kept at 25 students maximum. The first week is assigned to orientation topics (how to study, what the students want to cover in the course from a list of suggested topics from the standards, the teacher's methods), and the last week is assigned to testing. No teacher can teach all the benchmarks in 8 weeks, but the intention of the "managed enrollment" classes is to meet the needs of students who desire to achieve competency in work and life skill areas more efficiently and effectively that in the "open entry - open exit" classes. So far, evaluations of these classes is showing that students and teachers are satisfied with the results. The project in Miami Dade School District is called "Intensive English Academies" and can be reviewed at the Florida Adult ESOL task force website, www.floridaadultesol.org <http://www.floridaadultesol.org/> . Look for the pencil under "New Initiatives." CONTACT INFORMATION Philip Anderson Adult ESOL Program Specialist Division of Workforce Education Florida Department of Education 325 W. Gaines Street, Room 644 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Tel (850) 245-9450 Fax (850) 245-0995 Please take a few minutes to provide feedback on the quality of service you received from our staff. The Department of Education values your feedback as a customer. Commissioner of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith is committed to continuously assessing and improving the level and quality of services provided to you.Simply use the link below. Thank you in advance for completing the survey. http://data.fldoe.org/cs/default.cfm?staff=Philip.Anderson@fldoe.org|12:37:22%20Thu%2019%20Jun%202008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/specialtopics/attachments/20080619/fab176d2/attachment.html
More information about the SpecialTopics mailing list |