
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[Technology 2393] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
Education Coordinator
edcoor at hrcmc.orgFri Oct 16 13:09:12 EDT 2009
- Previous message: [Technology 2392] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
- Next message: [Technology 2395] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hooray. I have been saying for years with no one listening that a person
should already be ready to enter college -whether it is a Community College
or Harvard or MIT. they, at the very least, should be able to read with
fluency and understanding, have a grasp of alll kinds of history, at the
very least, what came before what AND the ability to write, on demand, a two
to three page something, fiction, non-fiction, a poem, an essay, -opinion
piece..
Money isn't the answer here - its demanding that in each grade - starting
with 1st that they get all the reading and writing skills they need at that
age. I would also add the ability to research beyond Wikipedia or indeed
beyond the Internet.
I'll shut up now. I could go on for a long time.
katie murdock
Ed. Coor.
Financial Education
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Nora Chahbazi <ooprc at comcast.net> wrote:
> Dear Michael - and all,
> Michael, I agree with you that this statement is just rhetoric (and it
> certainly sounds good; wish it could possible!) and is impossible, even if
> the perfect potential change happened - teachers were actually taught how to
> teach reading in colleges and students were actually taught how to read in
> school - it would take a lot longer than 2020 to reap the benefits. In the
> Diploma to Nowhere Report released last year -
> http://www.strongamericanschools.org/diploma-nowhere - it is reported that
> over $2 billion is spent yearly on remedial programs in colleges, 1.3
> million college students per year SEEK OUT remedial help including 43% of
> students from 2 year colleges and 29% of students from 4 year universities
> (this does not include the students who choose to not ask for remedial
> help), and 80% of those seeking remediation had a high school GPA of 3.0 or
> higher. So, as for an answer to your question of what it means to be a
> college graduate even today: 'not much' would seem to suffice. I think we
> would all agree that these statistics are alarming, to put it mildly.
> What can be done? We must first, as a nation, admit the enormity of
> the problem, make a decision to institute sweeping reform and overhaul both
> the education system and colleges of education, and drop the illusion of
> change that has been cloaked in rhetoric as well as gluttonously and blindly
> throwing billions of dollars at the issue. Illiteracy and education are
> both huge industries, with lots of sub industries surrounding them, and
> lots of groups and businesses have benefitted hugely and stand to
> benefit further from the deluge of dollars from the government up for grabs
> and thrown in their direction. The availability of such extensive amounts
> of money without a clear plan practically begs to result in waste, fraud,
> and abuse with lots of corruption sprinkled in. Our children (who after
> just a few years transition into undereducated adults) are suffering, our
> society is suffering, and we are going to pay dearly as a nation in the not
> too distant future if something significant is not done to change the course
> of this situation that has long been wildly careening out of control. We
> should learn from the excesses of the auto companies and financial
> industry...this can't go on forever without (further) dire consequences!
> Nora
>
> Nora Chahbazi, President
> EBLI Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction
> Ounce of Prevention Reading Center
> www.ebli.org
> 810.732.4810
> fax 810.732.0366
>
>
> .
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* technology-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:technology-bounces at nifl.gov] *On
> Behalf Of *Michael Gyori
> *Sent:* Friday, October 16, 2009 12:28 AM
> *To:* The Technology and Distance Learning Discussion List
> *Subject:* [Technology 2392] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
>
> Greetings to all,
>
> The FAQ document states:
>
> President Obama recently asserted the need to graduate more high school
> students and to support their transition to postsecondary education or
> career training programs. “By 2020, America will once again have the world’s
> highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” (Address to Joint
> Session of Congress, February 24, 2009)
>
> Before that, by the end of the 2013-14 school year, all children will be
> reading at grade level, according to No Child Left Behind.
>
> I also wonder what it will mean to be a college graduate in 2020. I'm not
> even sure what it means today.
>
> If 40% of all high school graduates, who have a high school diploma, cannot
> pass the G.E.D. test introduced in 2002, I really must wonder what any of
> this rhetoric really means, and whether teachers will be able to function
> with even more pressures on their plate.
>
> Why do I feel skeptical? After all, all we need to do is keep on pushing
> back the target dates...
>
> Michael
>
>
> Michael A. Gyori
>
> Maui International Language School
>
> www.mauilanguage.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jason Keith Guard/AC/VCU <jkguard at vcu.edu>
> *To:* The Technology and Distance Learning Discussion List <
> technology at nifl.gov>
> *Sent:* Thu, October 15, 2009 10:03:01 AM
> *Subject:* [Technology 2389] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
>
> The FAQ document released today by the GED Testing Service says that
> Computer Based Testing (CBT) with the GED will be piloted in 2010. They
> will also begin field testing test items that will fill gaps between
> conventional wisdom concerning college/career-readiness and the current GED
> 2002 test series.
>
> Thought on this? Will the test become more challenging? Will instruction
> need to integrate technology more seamlessly to adequately prepare testers
> for CBT? Will these development help expand GED credentialing or will adult
> learners be left behind by these developments?
>
> I look forward to the discussion. Here is the document.
>
>
> http://www.acenet.edu/Content/NavigationMenu/ged/National_Needs_Announcement_FAQs.pdf
>
> Jason Guard
> GED Specialist
> Virginia Adult Learning Resource Center
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> 3600 West Broad Street, Suite 669
> Richmond, VA 23230-4930
> Phone: 1-800-237-0178 or 804-827-2635
> Virginia GED Helpline: 1-877-376-9433
> eLearn Virginia: 1-888-589-9003
> Fax: 804-828-7539
> Email: jkguard at vcu.edu
> Twitter: jkguard
> www.valrc.org
> www.GEDVA.com
> www.elearnva.com
>
>
> *"Troy, Gail " <gtroy at nelson.k12.va.us>*
> Sent by: technology-bounces at nifl.gov
>
> 10/14/2009 05:18 PM Please respond to
> The Technology and Distance Learning Discussion List <
> technology at nifl.gov>
>
> To
> "The Technology and Distance Learning Discussion List" <
> technology at nifl.gov> cc
>
> Subject
> [Technology 2387] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I too wonder about that brief press release.
>
> I believe that adding a test on-line to show digital literacy could be done
> and would be a great idea.
>
> If the test is to be made more difficult, so that it is even more difficult
> than obtaining a high school diploma, (as you noted now 40% of graduating hs
> students could not pass) – ACE has a huge reality problem .
>
> Gail Troy, M.Ed
> Lead Teacher
> Nelson County Adult GED
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* technology-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:technology-bounces at nifl.gov<technology-bounces at nifl.gov>]
> *On Behalf Of *Jason Keith Guard/AC/VCU*
> Sent:* Wednesday, October 14, 2009 1:42 PM*
> To:* Technology at nifl.gov*
> Subject:* [Technology 2386] The *new* GED & Tech
>
> The GED Testing Service recently announced an apparent change in thinking
> about the content, purpose, and possibly method of delivery of the GED Test.
> (See their press release here: *
> http://www.acenet.edu/Content/NavigationMenu/ged/news/National_Needs_Alter_Plans_for_GED_5th_Edition_100809.pdf
> *<http://www.acenet.edu/Content/NavigationMenu/ged/news/National_Needs_Alter_Plans_for_GED_5th_Edition_100809.pdf>).
> Although roughly 40% percent of high school seniors cannot pass the GED
> test, the issue of the test's adequacy for certifying the skill levels of
> high school completers has long been at issue.
>
> The press release describes the new GED as "a new, more comprehensive
> assessment program." Two common areas of high school experience not
> addressed by the GED test are computer and digital literacy. My questions
> depends on your interpretation of the GED Testing Service announcement,
> because some there appears to be a shift taking place regarding the GED.
> Should the new test be administered using computers? Should technology be
> added to the GED as a content area? Would these changes help GEDTS frame
> the GED as gateway to college? Would a more sophisticated GED test leave
> too many people behind who would otherwise have been able to pass the test?
>
> Thanks for your consideration. I look forward to sharing our respective
> speculation.
>
> Jason Guard
> GED Specialist
> Virginia Adult Learning Resource Center
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> 3600 West Broad Street, Suite 669
> Richmond, VA 23230-4930
> Phone: 1-800-237-0178 or 804-827-2635
> Virginia GED Helpline: 1-877-376-9433
> eLearn Virginia: 1-888-589-9003
> Fax: 804-828-7539
> Email: jkguard at vcu.edu
> Twitter: jkguard*
> **www.valrc.org**
> **www.GEDVA.com**
> **www.elearnva.com*----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Technology and Distance Learning mailing list
> Technology at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/technology
> Email delivered to jkguard at vcu.edu
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Technology and Distance Learning mailing list
> Technology at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/technology
> Email delivered to edcoor at hrcmc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/technology/attachments/20091016/6759ba1d/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Technology 2392] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
- Next message: [Technology 2395] Re: The *new* GED & Tech
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Technology discussion list



