
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[Workplace] Fwd: OVAE Review December 2005
Donna Brian
djgbrian at utk.eduFri Dec 16 13:53:19 EST 2005
- Previous message: [Workplace] Fwd: New Issue of "Focus on Basics"
- Next message: [Workplace] Family Economics: Work and Wealth in the New Economy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>
>THE OVAE REVIEW
>
>December 15, 2005
>Beto Gonzalez, Acting Assistant Secretary
>Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE)
>U.S. Department of Education
>
>Angela Desrochers-Editor
>
>The Review is an update from the Office of the Assistant Secretary at the
>Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education.
>
><<http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev121505.html>http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev121505.html>
>
>
>Greetings from the Acting Assistant Secretary
>
>Recently, I had the privilege to speak at the annual conference of the
>Association of Career and Technical Education (ACTE). Excerpts from my
>speech are below. My message was simple. All students need a firm base
>in academics if they are to be successful in the 21st century economy.
>
>Federal involvement in vocational education is almost one hundred years
>old. The first vocational education act, of 1917, aimed to train students
>for jobs in an economy that was becoming rapidly industrialized, by
>targeting practical skills and training. The landscape has changed, and
>we owe it to our students to adapt our goals and strategies to the new
>environment in which we find ourselves.
>
>There are four major changes that have taken place over the last hundred
>years that must inform the new direction of career and technical
>education. However, all of these changes only serve to magnify the
>importance of a challenging academic base for all students.
>
>A hundred years ago the vast majority of students were not graduating from
>high school, much less completing any postsecondary training. But the
>jobs that those young people filled have either ceased to exist or are
>severely diminished. Today, the fastest growing jobs require in depth
>technological knowledge and strong analytical skills. In many cases,
>traditional distinctions no longer make sense. For example, once being an
>auto mechanic required little to no academic training. Now, most cars and
>trucks include more sophisticated computers then the Apollo 11 spacecraft,
>requiring advanced postsecondary training and a good grasp of
>technology. In this modern environment, a rigorous academic preparation
>is a practical education.
>
>Another important change is the quick pace of globalization, which has
>created a global job market more fluid than any in history. Futurist Alan
>Toffler said a few years ago the illiterate of the 21st century will not
>be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn,
>and relearn. A solid academic foundation will help today s students
>adapt to the projected 15 careers they will have in their lifetime.
>
>Along with globalization comes increased competition from
>abroad. Outsourcing is making inroads into skilled as well as unskilled
>employment. Employers are going abroad to find well educated and trained
>employees because the American educational system is not doing an adequate
>job. Too many of our students are being out-educated, out-performed, and
>will soon be out-employed by foreign competition. We need to equip our
>students to thrive in this new environment.
>
>The last change is the awareness of our accountability for the persistent
>achievement gap affecting minorities and the academically
>disadvantaged. These groups traditionally participate in vocational
>education in high numbers and we are letting them down. We know, for
>example, that educational level directly correlates with earning
>capacity. And we know that education must expand our students choices,
>not limit them. That is how education promotes freedom, equality, and
>human dignity.
>
>However, there is good news for the achievement gap. Increasingly,
>evidence shows that achievement rises along with expectations. No Child
>Left Behind is ensuring high expectations for all children and it is
>working. A new Nation s Report Card came out recently. Achievement is on
>the rise-especially for fourth-graders. African-American and Hispanic
>students are posting all-time high scores in a number of categories. High
>expectations are liberating, not punitive.
>
>These four changes to our educational and social landscape make it clear
>that the vocational educational models of the past will not serve the
>needs of American students in this, the 21st century. We can no longer see
>vocational education as an alternative to a rigorous academic
>curriculum. However, we will continue to build on the strengths of
>vocational education -- strengths like using extracurricular learning to
>enhance the classroom experience.
>
>What we must recognize is that your students don t need to choose between
>academic excellence in the classroom and practical experience in a
>technical vocation. If we provide them with both, then they are doubly
>empowered to choose a successful path in life, and then choose and choose
>again as new opportunities, new challenges, or simply new interests, arise.
>
>I look forward to continuing to work together to ensure every student
>receives the education they need to thrive in the 21st century.
>
>Happy Holidays.
>
>Beto Gonzalez
>
>Community Colleges
>
>Community College Working Group on Adult Education held in Washington, DC
>
>On November 28, the Office of Vocational and Adult Education sponsored the
>sixth in a series of Community College Working Group Meetings. These
>meetings bring together community college presidents or chancellors
>together with leaders from the Office of Vocational and Adult Education
>(OVAE) and other federal offices to discuss opportunities, challenges, and
>promising practices.
>
>The November 2005 Working Group focused on adult education and the
>community college - helping Adult Basic Education (ABE) and English
>Literacy (EL) students move through career pathway programs in community
>colleges. Eleven presidents or campus leaders of community colleges
>participated in the sessions, with two additional presidents serving as
>presenters. The session included two panels focusing on strengthening the
>success of community colleges in moving students through adult basic
>education and language proficiency classes into credit-bearing and
>credential-earning career pathways. The first panel discussion focused on
>research, initiatives, as well as foundation and business support. The
>other explored promising models or practices in three different states
>(Ohio, Oregon, and Washington). The college presidents engaged in topics
>including support services for low skilled adults, models for financial
>incentives for students, financing integrated training and English
>literacy instruction, and collaborative models for supporting career
>pathway initiatives.
>
>A summary of the meeting will include sections on the key challenges, as
>well as recommendations for action by colleges, employers, and state or
>federal policymakers and administrators. In addition, there will be a
>summary of the primary points or programs cited by the panelists.
>
>For more information please go to,
>www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html
><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html>
>
>Adult Education and Literacy
>
>STAR Teachers Test Evidence-Based Reading Strategies
>
>One hundred and twenty adult education teachers, newly trained in
>evidence-based methods to teach adults reading, returned to six pilot
>states this month for the implementation phase of STAR (Student
>Achievement in Reading). STAR is a nearly $6M, seven-year OVAE investment
>running through spring of 2008. Pilot states participating in STAR
>include California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Ohio, and South Dakota.
>
>In the first phase of STAR, experts developed a reading toolkit of
>assessments and strategies for intermediate level adult reading
>instruction. STAR s trained teachers now will use toolkit diagnostics to
>identify students strengths and address students limitations using
>evidence-based toolkit strategies. STAR teachers are excited about the
>project because they can identify key areas in which students need help,
>and students appreciate teachers who have tools that address their
>specific academic needs. For example, two adult students may be assessed
>at a fourth grade reading level. One adult may perform at that level due
>to problems with vocabulary, but the other student may have problems with
>comprehension. While appearing to be identical, these issues differ and
>must be addressed by different techniques. After using assessments in the
>toolkit to determine student reading levels, STAR teachers will pull
>evidence-based strategies from the toolkit to address specific reading
>components and help each student develop particular skills.
>
>This implementation phase also will determine to what degree teachers can
>use techniques from the toolkit supported by research in their classrooms,
>given any administrative barriers that exist. STAR participants are
>discovering the importance of changing how local programs are organized.
>They are identifying issues such as managed enrollment, differentiated
>instruction in multi-level classes, teacher planning time and
>instructional leadership as being key to their plans for success. States
>are discussing how funding policies may help or hinder implementing
>evidence-based reading practice and how to deliver professional
>development that supports site-based reform. Over the next several
>months, STAR teachers will bring research and reality together. Stay
>tuned for updates on how STAR is combining the two successfully in adult
>education classrooms.
>
>For more information, please go to
><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/reading.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/reading.html>
>
>
>Secondary, Career and Technical Education
>
>Perkins Data Quality Institute (DQI)
>
>OVAE will provide training via the Perkins Data Quality Institute (DQI),
>to be held in Washington, D.C., from noon on February 8 to noon on
>February 10, 2006. The prospective agenda and logistical information may
>be found at the Peer Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN) Web site
>(www.edcountability.net <http://www.edcountability.net>).
>
>There will be five objectives, but standardizing definitions and measures
>for the Perkins core indicators of performance will be the ultimate
>goal. The institute will feature federal and state panelists who will
>discuss their strategies and tools for ongoing improvements in program and
>data quality.
>
>This DQI training will continue with regional meetings to be held in May
>2006, but as of now those dates and location have not been
>confirmed. Please stay tuned to the PCRN Web site for information about
>these regional meetings.
>
>There is a $175 registration fee for the February DQI; the last day for
>registration will be January 13, 2006. For more information, please
>contact Jay Savage at (202) 245-6612 or jay.savage at ed.gov
><<mailto:jay.savage at ed.gov>mailto:jay.savage at ed.gov>.
>
>U.S. Denmark Partnership Meeting
>
>On November 16, 2000, the U.S. Department of Education and the Danish
>Education Department signed a partnership agreement designed to help each
>country with improvement of their vocational and technical education system.
>
>As a part of the agreement the two countries formed a Steering Committee
>that meets on a yearly basis to discusses ideas of mutual interest. This
>year s meeting was held in Copenhagen preceded by two days of site visits
>to a number of educational settings in Jutland, a province about two hours
>from Copenhagen. The American delegation, led by the Acting Assistant
>Secretary, visited business colleges, a science gymnasium, and a
>vocational-technical center. These visits illustrated both the
>commonalties and the differences of the two educational systems. Although
>Denmark is much smaller in size than the U.S., it is challenged by many of
>the same issues: globalization of the marketplace, an aging population,
>and an increasing immigrant population.
>
>The agreement emphasizes three key areas:
>· Exploring cooperation, information sharing, and research relating
>to the development of skill standards, curriculum, assessment and teacher
>development. · Using technological resources to improve business and
>vocational education in colleges, technical and business schools, and
>other agencies. · Developing joint projects through learning,
>organizational and institutional partnerships.
>For more information about the partnership, please go to
>www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html
><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html>.
>
>National Association of Manufacturers Releases 2005 Skills Gap Report
>
>According to the recently released 2005 Skills Gap Report, produced by the
>National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), there is a serious shortage
>of qualified manufacturing employees in the United States of America.
>
>The Survey exposes a widening gap between the dwindling supply of skilled
>workers in America and the growing technical demands of the modern
>manufacturing workplace, explained NAM President John Engler. He further
>went on to say It is essential that America close this skills gap if we
>are to maintain our edge in the global marketplace and remain the world s
>leader in innovation.
>
>More than 80 percent of manufacturers surveyed are experiencing an overall
>shortage of qualified workers, while 46 percent reported that the skill
>levels are poor among current employees.
>
>To address some of the critical issues facing manufacturers, the report
>recommends:
>· Educators to emphasize science, math and technology-related
>programs in K-12 curricula and invest more in teacher
>education; · State education standards to include career education
>as measurable criteria for K-12 success; · Employers to invest at
>least 3 percent of payroll whenever possible in training for current
>employees; and · Government to partner with business to improve the
>K-12 and community college system to develop a high-performance workforce.
>The 2005 Skills Gap Report is based on responses from more than 800
>manufacturers of all sizes nationwide and is the first new comprehensive
>survey about the American manufacturing workforce in five years. It is
>available at www.nam.org/2005skillsgap
><<http://www.nam.org/2005skillsgap>http://www.nam.org/2005skillsgap>.
>
>(Excerpts from National Association of Manufacturers press release, Nov.
>22, 2005)
>
>Other Department News
>
>Secretary s Rural Education Task Force
>
>To respond to the needs of children in rural schools, Secretary Margaret
>Spellings re-invigorated the Rural Education Task Force. Acting Assistant
>Secretary for the Office of Vocational and Adult Education Beto Gonzalez
>is the Task Force Chair. Linda Hall, who is the Executive Director of the
>Task Force, will be assisting him. The Rural Education Task Force is
>designed to bring renewed attention to the problems and issues of rural
>schools in meeting the challenges posed by the No Child Left Behind Act.
>
>The purpose of the Task Force, supported by the Center for Rural Education
>is to:
>· Serve as the voice of rural education both within the Department
>and in the rural community · Coordinate and implement outreach
>efforts to rural constituents · Develop a dissemination plan,
>targeted to rural communities · Facilitate working groups that
>examine both challenges and promising practices of rural
>education · Produce policy documents and publications that address
>issues in the rural community
>Questions regarding the Task Force and its activities may be sent to
>RuralED at ed.gov <<mailto:RuralED at ed.gov>mailto:RuralED at ed.gov>.
>
>Statement from Secretary Spellings on Release of Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund
>Grants
>On December 7, U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings released the
>following statement applauding the release of $90 million in grant relief
>money from the Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund:
>"The announcement today by former Presidents Bush and Clinton exemplifies
>our nation's spirit of unity and compassion. Their generosity and
>dedication in establishing this fund has been more than matched by the
>overwhelming response of Americans, who have dug deep to help their
>neighbors in need. "Hurricane Katrina stripped the Gulf Coast region of
>even its most basic and essential services, shutting down hundreds of
>schools and displacing hundreds of thousands of students. One-third of the
>grant funds, $30 million, will go toward repairing or replacing buildings
>and equipment at institutions of higher learning. It will also support the
>faculty and staff who have seen their lives interrupted by the storm. We
>cannot allow the accumulated research and hard work of these fine teachers
>and scholars to be washed away. "The U.S. Department of Education
>continues to do its part as well. We are working with states and schools
>in the region and elsewhere to ensure a minimum of disruption for
>students. We've held roundtable meetings with education and mental health
>experts to help children and families recover. We established the
>Hurricane Help for Schools online clearinghouse, which enables Americans
>to match their donations to meet schools' most pressing needs. To date,
>more than 500 matches have been made. And President Bush has proposed an
>urgently needed education relief package, which we are eager to see
>Congress approve. "In this season of giving, the American people have sent
>a positive and powerful message to the world-our nation will come together
>in times of need."
>
>
>
>
>
- Previous message: [Workplace] Fwd: New Issue of "Focus on Basics"
- Next message: [Workplace] Family Economics: Work and Wealth in the New Economy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Workplace discussion list



