[Workplace] Fwd: OVAE Review December 2005Donna Brian djgbrian at utk.eduFri Dec 16 13:53:19 EST 2005
> >THE OVAE REVIEW > >December 15, 2005 >Beto Gonzalez, Acting Assistant Secretary >Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE) >U.S. Department of Education > >Angela Desrochers-Editor > >The Review is an update from the Office of the Assistant Secretary at the >Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education. > ><<http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev121505.html>http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev121505.html> > > >Greetings from the Acting Assistant Secretary > >Recently, I had the privilege to speak at the annual conference of the >Association of Career and Technical Education (ACTE). Excerpts from my >speech are below. My message was simple. All students need a firm base >in academics if they are to be successful in the 21st century economy. > >Federal involvement in vocational education is almost one hundred years >old. The first vocational education act, of 1917, aimed to train students >for jobs in an economy that was becoming rapidly industrialized, by >targeting practical skills and training. The landscape has changed, and >we owe it to our students to adapt our goals and strategies to the new >environment in which we find ourselves. > >There are four major changes that have taken place over the last hundred >years that must inform the new direction of career and technical >education. However, all of these changes only serve to magnify the >importance of a challenging academic base for all students. > >A hundred years ago the vast majority of students were not graduating from >high school, much less completing any postsecondary training. But the >jobs that those young people filled have either ceased to exist or are >severely diminished. Today, the fastest growing jobs require in depth >technological knowledge and strong analytical skills. In many cases, >traditional distinctions no longer make sense. For example, once being an >auto mechanic required little to no academic training. Now, most cars and >trucks include more sophisticated computers then the Apollo 11 spacecraft, >requiring advanced postsecondary training and a good grasp of >technology. In this modern environment, a rigorous academic preparation >is a practical education. > >Another important change is the quick pace of globalization, which has >created a global job market more fluid than any in history. Futurist Alan >Toffler said a few years ago the illiterate of the 21st century will not >be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, >and relearn. A solid academic foundation will help today s students >adapt to the projected 15 careers they will have in their lifetime. > >Along with globalization comes increased competition from >abroad. Outsourcing is making inroads into skilled as well as unskilled >employment. Employers are going abroad to find well educated and trained >employees because the American educational system is not doing an adequate >job. Too many of our students are being out-educated, out-performed, and >will soon be out-employed by foreign competition. We need to equip our >students to thrive in this new environment. > >The last change is the awareness of our accountability for the persistent >achievement gap affecting minorities and the academically >disadvantaged. These groups traditionally participate in vocational >education in high numbers and we are letting them down. We know, for >example, that educational level directly correlates with earning >capacity. And we know that education must expand our students choices, >not limit them. That is how education promotes freedom, equality, and >human dignity. > >However, there is good news for the achievement gap. Increasingly, >evidence shows that achievement rises along with expectations. No Child >Left Behind is ensuring high expectations for all children and it is >working. A new Nation s Report Card came out recently. Achievement is on >the rise-especially for fourth-graders. African-American and Hispanic >students are posting all-time high scores in a number of categories. High >expectations are liberating, not punitive. > >These four changes to our educational and social landscape make it clear >that the vocational educational models of the past will not serve the >needs of American students in this, the 21st century. We can no longer see >vocational education as an alternative to a rigorous academic >curriculum. However, we will continue to build on the strengths of >vocational education -- strengths like using extracurricular learning to >enhance the classroom experience. > >What we must recognize is that your students don t need to choose between >academic excellence in the classroom and practical experience in a >technical vocation. If we provide them with both, then they are doubly >empowered to choose a successful path in life, and then choose and choose >again as new opportunities, new challenges, or simply new interests, arise. > >I look forward to continuing to work together to ensure every student >receives the education they need to thrive in the 21st century. > >Happy Holidays. > >Beto Gonzalez > >Community Colleges > >Community College Working Group on Adult Education held in Washington, DC > >On November 28, the Office of Vocational and Adult Education sponsored the >sixth in a series of Community College Working Group Meetings. These >meetings bring together community college presidents or chancellors >together with leaders from the Office of Vocational and Adult Education >(OVAE) and other federal offices to discuss opportunities, challenges, and >promising practices. > >The November 2005 Working Group focused on adult education and the >community college - helping Adult Basic Education (ABE) and English >Literacy (EL) students move through career pathway programs in community >colleges. Eleven presidents or campus leaders of community colleges >participated in the sessions, with two additional presidents serving as >presenters. The session included two panels focusing on strengthening the >success of community colleges in moving students through adult basic >education and language proficiency classes into credit-bearing and >credential-earning career pathways. The first panel discussion focused on >research, initiatives, as well as foundation and business support. The >other explored promising models or practices in three different states >(Ohio, Oregon, and Washington). The college presidents engaged in topics >including support services for low skilled adults, models for financial >incentives for students, financing integrated training and English >literacy instruction, and collaborative models for supporting career >pathway initiatives. > >A summary of the meeting will include sections on the key challenges, as >well as recommendations for action by colleges, employers, and state or >federal policymakers and administrators. In addition, there will be a >summary of the primary points or programs cited by the panelists. > >For more information please go to, >www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html ><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html> > >Adult Education and Literacy > >STAR Teachers Test Evidence-Based Reading Strategies > >One hundred and twenty adult education teachers, newly trained in >evidence-based methods to teach adults reading, returned to six pilot >states this month for the implementation phase of STAR (Student >Achievement in Reading). STAR is a nearly $6M, seven-year OVAE investment >running through spring of 2008. Pilot states participating in STAR >include California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Ohio, and South Dakota. > >In the first phase of STAR, experts developed a reading toolkit of >assessments and strategies for intermediate level adult reading >instruction. STAR s trained teachers now will use toolkit diagnostics to >identify students strengths and address students limitations using >evidence-based toolkit strategies. STAR teachers are excited about the >project because they can identify key areas in which students need help, >and students appreciate teachers who have tools that address their >specific academic needs. For example, two adult students may be assessed >at a fourth grade reading level. One adult may perform at that level due >to problems with vocabulary, but the other student may have problems with >comprehension. While appearing to be identical, these issues differ and >must be addressed by different techniques. After using assessments in the >toolkit to determine student reading levels, STAR teachers will pull >evidence-based strategies from the toolkit to address specific reading >components and help each student develop particular skills. > >This implementation phase also will determine to what degree teachers can >use techniques from the toolkit supported by research in their classrooms, >given any administrative barriers that exist. STAR participants are >discovering the importance of changing how local programs are organized. >They are identifying issues such as managed enrollment, differentiated >instruction in multi-level classes, teacher planning time and >instructional leadership as being key to their plans for success. States >are discussing how funding policies may help or hinder implementing >evidence-based reading practice and how to deliver professional >development that supports site-based reform. Over the next several >months, STAR teachers will bring research and reality together. Stay >tuned for updates on how STAR is combining the two successfully in adult >education classrooms. > >For more information, please go to ><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/reading.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/reading.html> > > >Secondary, Career and Technical Education > >Perkins Data Quality Institute (DQI) > >OVAE will provide training via the Perkins Data Quality Institute (DQI), >to be held in Washington, D.C., from noon on February 8 to noon on >February 10, 2006. The prospective agenda and logistical information may >be found at the Peer Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN) Web site >(www.edcountability.net <http://www.edcountability.net>). > >There will be five objectives, but standardizing definitions and measures >for the Perkins core indicators of performance will be the ultimate >goal. The institute will feature federal and state panelists who will >discuss their strategies and tools for ongoing improvements in program and >data quality. > >This DQI training will continue with regional meetings to be held in May >2006, but as of now those dates and location have not been >confirmed. Please stay tuned to the PCRN Web site for information about >these regional meetings. > >There is a $175 registration fee for the February DQI; the last day for >registration will be January 13, 2006. For more information, please >contact Jay Savage at (202) 245-6612 or jay.savage at ed.gov ><<mailto:jay.savage at ed.gov>mailto:jay.savage at ed.gov>. > >U.S. Denmark Partnership Meeting > >On November 16, 2000, the U.S. Department of Education and the Danish >Education Department signed a partnership agreement designed to help each >country with improvement of their vocational and technical education system. > >As a part of the agreement the two countries formed a Steering Committee >that meets on a yearly basis to discusses ideas of mutual interest. This >year s meeting was held in Copenhagen preceded by two days of site visits >to a number of educational settings in Jutland, a province about two hours >from Copenhagen. The American delegation, led by the Acting Assistant >Secretary, visited business colleges, a science gymnasium, and a >vocational-technical center. These visits illustrated both the >commonalties and the differences of the two educational systems. Although >Denmark is much smaller in size than the U.S., it is challenged by many of >the same issues: globalization of the marketplace, an aging population, >and an increasing immigrant population. > >The agreement emphasizes three key areas: >· Exploring cooperation, information sharing, and research relating >to the development of skill standards, curriculum, assessment and teacher >development. · Using technological resources to improve business and >vocational education in colleges, technical and business schools, and >other agencies. · Developing joint projects through learning, >organizational and institutional partnerships. >For more information about the partnership, please go to >www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html ><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html>. > >National Association of Manufacturers Releases 2005 Skills Gap Report > >According to the recently released 2005 Skills Gap Report, produced by the >National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), there is a serious shortage >of qualified manufacturing employees in the United States of America. > >The Survey exposes a widening gap between the dwindling supply of skilled >workers in America and the growing technical demands of the modern >manufacturing workplace, explained NAM President John Engler. He further >went on to say It is essential that America close this skills gap if we >are to maintain our edge in the global marketplace and remain the world s >leader in innovation. > >More than 80 percent of manufacturers surveyed are experiencing an overall >shortage of qualified workers, while 46 percent reported that the skill >levels are poor among current employees. > >To address some of the critical issues facing manufacturers, the report >recommends: >· Educators to emphasize science, math and technology-related >programs in K-12 curricula and invest more in teacher >education; · State education standards to include career education >as measurable criteria for K-12 success; · Employers to invest at >least 3 percent of payroll whenever possible in training for current >employees; and · Government to partner with business to improve the >K-12 and community college system to develop a high-performance workforce. >The 2005 Skills Gap Report is based on responses from more than 800 >manufacturers of all sizes nationwide and is the first new comprehensive >survey about the American manufacturing workforce in five years. It is >available at www.nam.org/2005skillsgap ><<http://www.nam.org/2005skillsgap>http://www.nam.org/2005skillsgap>. > >(Excerpts from National Association of Manufacturers press release, Nov. >22, 2005) > >Other Department News > >Secretary s Rural Education Task Force > >To respond to the needs of children in rural schools, Secretary Margaret >Spellings re-invigorated the Rural Education Task Force. Acting Assistant >Secretary for the Office of Vocational and Adult Education Beto Gonzalez >is the Task Force Chair. Linda Hall, who is the Executive Director of the >Task Force, will be assisting him. The Rural Education Task Force is >designed to bring renewed attention to the problems and issues of rural >schools in meeting the challenges posed by the No Child Left Behind Act. > >The purpose of the Task Force, supported by the Center for Rural Education >is to: >· Serve as the voice of rural education both within the Department >and in the rural community · Coordinate and implement outreach >efforts to rural constituents · Develop a dissemination plan, >targeted to rural communities · Facilitate working groups that >examine both challenges and promising practices of rural >education · Produce policy documents and publications that address >issues in the rural community >Questions regarding the Task Force and its activities may be sent to >RuralED at ed.gov <<mailto:RuralED at ed.gov>mailto:RuralED at ed.gov>. > >Statement from Secretary Spellings on Release of Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund >Grants >On December 7, U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings released the >following statement applauding the release of $90 million in grant relief >money from the Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund: >"The announcement today by former Presidents Bush and Clinton exemplifies >our nation's spirit of unity and compassion. Their generosity and >dedication in establishing this fund has been more than matched by the >overwhelming response of Americans, who have dug deep to help their >neighbors in need. "Hurricane Katrina stripped the Gulf Coast region of >even its most basic and essential services, shutting down hundreds of >schools and displacing hundreds of thousands of students. One-third of the >grant funds, $30 million, will go toward repairing or replacing buildings >and equipment at institutions of higher learning. It will also support the >faculty and staff who have seen their lives interrupted by the storm. We >cannot allow the accumulated research and hard work of these fine teachers >and scholars to be washed away. "The U.S. Department of Education >continues to do its part as well. We are working with states and schools >in the region and elsewhere to ensure a minimum of disruption for >students. We've held roundtable meetings with education and mental health >experts to help children and families recover. We established the >Hurricane Help for Schools online clearinghouse, which enables Americans >to match their donations to meet schools' most pressing needs. To date, >more than 500 matches have been made. And President Bush has proposed an >urgently needed education relief package, which we are eager to see >Congress approve. "In this season of giving, the American people have sent >a positive and powerful message to the world-our nation will come together >in times of need." > > > > >
More information about the Workplace mailing list |