National Institute for Literacy
 

[Workplace] Fwd: OVAE Review December 2005

Donna Brian djgbrian at utk.edu
Fri Dec 16 13:53:19 EST 2005




>

>THE OVAE REVIEW

>

>December 15, 2005

>Beto Gonzalez, Acting Assistant Secretary

>Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE)

>U.S. Department of Education

>

>Angela Desrochers-Editor

>

>The Review is an update from the Office of the Assistant Secretary at the

>Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education.

>

><<http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev121505.html>http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev121505.html>

>

>

>Greetings from the Acting Assistant Secretary

>

>Recently, I had the privilege to speak at the annual conference of the

>Association of Career and Technical Education (ACTE). Excerpts from my

>speech are below. My message was simple. All students need a firm base

>in academics if they are to be successful in the 21st century economy.

>

>Federal involvement in vocational education is almost one hundred years

>old. The first vocational education act, of 1917, aimed to train students

>for jobs in an economy that was becoming rapidly industrialized, by

>targeting practical skills and training. The landscape has changed, and

>we owe it to our students to adapt our goals and strategies to the new

>environment in which we find ourselves.

>

>There are four major changes that have taken place over the last hundred

>years that must inform the new direction of career and technical

>education. However, all of these changes only serve to magnify the

>importance of a challenging academic base for all students.

>

>A hundred years ago the vast majority of students were not graduating from

>high school, much less completing any postsecondary training. But the

>jobs that those young people filled have either ceased to exist or are

>severely diminished. Today, the fastest growing jobs require in depth

>technological knowledge and strong analytical skills. In many cases,

>traditional distinctions no longer make sense. For example, once being an

>auto mechanic required little to no academic training. Now, most cars and

>trucks include more sophisticated computers then the Apollo 11 spacecraft,

>requiring advanced postsecondary training and a good grasp of

>technology. In this modern environment, a rigorous academic preparation

>is a practical education.

>

>Another important change is the quick pace of globalization, which has

>created a global job market more fluid than any in history. Futurist Alan

>Toffler said a few years ago the illiterate of the 21st century will not

>be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn,

>and relearn. A solid academic foundation will help today s students

>adapt to the projected 15 careers they will have in their lifetime.

>

>Along with globalization comes increased competition from

>abroad. Outsourcing is making inroads into skilled as well as unskilled

>employment. Employers are going abroad to find well educated and trained

>employees because the American educational system is not doing an adequate

>job. Too many of our students are being out-educated, out-performed, and

>will soon be out-employed by foreign competition. We need to equip our

>students to thrive in this new environment.

>

>The last change is the awareness of our accountability for the persistent

>achievement gap affecting minorities and the academically

>disadvantaged. These groups traditionally participate in vocational

>education in high numbers and we are letting them down. We know, for

>example, that educational level directly correlates with earning

>capacity. And we know that education must expand our students choices,

>not limit them. That is how education promotes freedom, equality, and

>human dignity.

>

>However, there is good news for the achievement gap. Increasingly,

>evidence shows that achievement rises along with expectations. No Child

>Left Behind is ensuring high expectations for all children and it is

>working. A new Nation s Report Card came out recently. Achievement is on

>the rise-especially for fourth-graders. African-American and Hispanic

>students are posting all-time high scores in a number of categories. High

>expectations are liberating, not punitive.

>

>These four changes to our educational and social landscape make it clear

>that the vocational educational models of the past will not serve the

>needs of American students in this, the 21st century. We can no longer see

>vocational education as an alternative to a rigorous academic

>curriculum. However, we will continue to build on the strengths of

>vocational education -- strengths like using extracurricular learning to

>enhance the classroom experience.

>

>What we must recognize is that your students don t need to choose between

>academic excellence in the classroom and practical experience in a

>technical vocation. If we provide them with both, then they are doubly

>empowered to choose a successful path in life, and then choose and choose

>again as new opportunities, new challenges, or simply new interests, arise.

>

>I look forward to continuing to work together to ensure every student

>receives the education they need to thrive in the 21st century.

>

>Happy Holidays.

>

>Beto Gonzalez

>

>Community Colleges

>

>Community College Working Group on Adult Education held in Washington, DC

>

>On November 28, the Office of Vocational and Adult Education sponsored the

>sixth in a series of Community College Working Group Meetings. These

>meetings bring together community college presidents or chancellors

>together with leaders from the Office of Vocational and Adult Education

>(OVAE) and other federal offices to discuss opportunities, challenges, and

>promising practices.

>

>The November 2005 Working Group focused on adult education and the

>community college - helping Adult Basic Education (ABE) and English

>Literacy (EL) students move through career pathway programs in community

>colleges. Eleven presidents or campus leaders of community colleges

>participated in the sessions, with two additional presidents serving as

>presenters. The session included two panels focusing on strengthening the

>success of community colleges in moving students through adult basic

>education and language proficiency classes into credit-bearing and

>credential-earning career pathways. The first panel discussion focused on

>research, initiatives, as well as foundation and business support. The

>other explored promising models or practices in three different states

>(Ohio, Oregon, and Washington). The college presidents engaged in topics

>including support services for low skilled adults, models for financial

>incentives for students, financing integrated training and English

>literacy instruction, and collaborative models for supporting career

>pathway initiatives.

>

>A summary of the meeting will include sections on the key challenges, as

>well as recommendations for action by colleges, employers, and state or

>federal policymakers and administrators. In addition, there will be a

>summary of the primary points or programs cited by the panelists.

>

>For more information please go to,

>www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html

><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/index.html>

>

>Adult Education and Literacy

>

>STAR Teachers Test Evidence-Based Reading Strategies

>

>One hundred and twenty adult education teachers, newly trained in

>evidence-based methods to teach adults reading, returned to six pilot

>states this month for the implementation phase of STAR (Student

>Achievement in Reading). STAR is a nearly $6M, seven-year OVAE investment

>running through spring of 2008. Pilot states participating in STAR

>include California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Ohio, and South Dakota.

>

>In the first phase of STAR, experts developed a reading toolkit of

>assessments and strategies for intermediate level adult reading

>instruction. STAR s trained teachers now will use toolkit diagnostics to

>identify students strengths and address students limitations using

>evidence-based toolkit strategies. STAR teachers are excited about the

>project because they can identify key areas in which students need help,

>and students appreciate teachers who have tools that address their

>specific academic needs. For example, two adult students may be assessed

>at a fourth grade reading level. One adult may perform at that level due

>to problems with vocabulary, but the other student may have problems with

>comprehension. While appearing to be identical, these issues differ and

>must be addressed by different techniques. After using assessments in the

>toolkit to determine student reading levels, STAR teachers will pull

>evidence-based strategies from the toolkit to address specific reading

>components and help each student develop particular skills.

>

>This implementation phase also will determine to what degree teachers can

>use techniques from the toolkit supported by research in their classrooms,

>given any administrative barriers that exist. STAR participants are

>discovering the importance of changing how local programs are organized.

>They are identifying issues such as managed enrollment, differentiated

>instruction in multi-level classes, teacher planning time and

>instructional leadership as being key to their plans for success. States

>are discussing how funding policies may help or hinder implementing

>evidence-based reading practice and how to deliver professional

>development that supports site-based reform. Over the next several

>months, STAR teachers will bring research and reality together. Stay

>tuned for updates on how STAR is combining the two successfully in adult

>education classrooms.

>

>For more information, please go to

><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/reading.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/reading.html>

>

>

>Secondary, Career and Technical Education

>

>Perkins Data Quality Institute (DQI)

>

>OVAE will provide training via the Perkins Data Quality Institute (DQI),

>to be held in Washington, D.C., from noon on February 8 to noon on

>February 10, 2006. The prospective agenda and logistical information may

>be found at the Peer Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN) Web site

>(www.edcountability.net <http://www.edcountability.net>).

>

>There will be five objectives, but standardizing definitions and measures

>for the Perkins core indicators of performance will be the ultimate

>goal. The institute will feature federal and state panelists who will

>discuss their strategies and tools for ongoing improvements in program and

>data quality.

>

>This DQI training will continue with regional meetings to be held in May

>2006, but as of now those dates and location have not been

>confirmed. Please stay tuned to the PCRN Web site for information about

>these regional meetings.

>

>There is a $175 registration fee for the February DQI; the last day for

>registration will be January 13, 2006. For more information, please

>contact Jay Savage at (202) 245-6612 or jay.savage at ed.gov

><<mailto:jay.savage at ed.gov>mailto:jay.savage at ed.gov>.

>

>U.S. Denmark Partnership Meeting

>

>On November 16, 2000, the U.S. Department of Education and the Danish

>Education Department signed a partnership agreement designed to help each

>country with improvement of their vocational and technical education system.

>

>As a part of the agreement the two countries formed a Steering Committee

>that meets on a yearly basis to discusses ideas of mutual interest. This

>year s meeting was held in Copenhagen preceded by two days of site visits

>to a number of educational settings in Jutland, a province about two hours

>from Copenhagen. The American delegation, led by the Acting Assistant

>Secretary, visited business colleges, a science gymnasium, and a

>vocational-technical center. These visits illustrated both the

>commonalties and the differences of the two educational systems. Although

>Denmark is much smaller in size than the U.S., it is challenged by many of

>the same issues: globalization of the marketplace, an aging population,

>and an increasing immigrant population.

>

>The agreement emphasizes three key areas:

>· Exploring cooperation, information sharing, and research relating

>to the development of skill standards, curriculum, assessment and teacher

>development. · Using technological resources to improve business and

>vocational education in colleges, technical and business schools, and

>other agencies. · Developing joint projects through learning,

>organizational and institutional partnerships.

>For more information about the partnership, please go to

>www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html

><<http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html>http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/usdnmrk/index.html>.

>

>National Association of Manufacturers Releases 2005 Skills Gap Report

>

>According to the recently released 2005 Skills Gap Report, produced by the

>National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), there is a serious shortage

>of qualified manufacturing employees in the United States of America.

>

>The Survey exposes a widening gap between the dwindling supply of skilled

>workers in America and the growing technical demands of the modern

>manufacturing workplace, explained NAM President John Engler. He further

>went on to say It is essential that America close this skills gap if we

>are to maintain our edge in the global marketplace and remain the world s

>leader in innovation.

>

>More than 80 percent of manufacturers surveyed are experiencing an overall

>shortage of qualified workers, while 46 percent reported that the skill

>levels are poor among current employees.

>

>To address some of the critical issues facing manufacturers, the report

>recommends:

>· Educators to emphasize science, math and technology-related

>programs in K-12 curricula and invest more in teacher

>education; · State education standards to include career education

>as measurable criteria for K-12 success; · Employers to invest at

>least 3 percent of payroll whenever possible in training for current

>employees; and · Government to partner with business to improve the

>K-12 and community college system to develop a high-performance workforce.

>The 2005 Skills Gap Report is based on responses from more than 800

>manufacturers of all sizes nationwide and is the first new comprehensive

>survey about the American manufacturing workforce in five years. It is

>available at www.nam.org/2005skillsgap

><<http://www.nam.org/2005skillsgap>http://www.nam.org/2005skillsgap>.

>

>(Excerpts from National Association of Manufacturers press release, Nov.

>22, 2005)

>

>Other Department News

>

>Secretary s Rural Education Task Force

>

>To respond to the needs of children in rural schools, Secretary Margaret

>Spellings re-invigorated the Rural Education Task Force. Acting Assistant

>Secretary for the Office of Vocational and Adult Education Beto Gonzalez

>is the Task Force Chair. Linda Hall, who is the Executive Director of the

>Task Force, will be assisting him. The Rural Education Task Force is

>designed to bring renewed attention to the problems and issues of rural

>schools in meeting the challenges posed by the No Child Left Behind Act.

>

>The purpose of the Task Force, supported by the Center for Rural Education

>is to:

>· Serve as the voice of rural education both within the Department

>and in the rural community · Coordinate and implement outreach

>efforts to rural constituents · Develop a dissemination plan,

>targeted to rural communities · Facilitate working groups that

>examine both challenges and promising practices of rural

>education · Produce policy documents and publications that address

>issues in the rural community

>Questions regarding the Task Force and its activities may be sent to

>RuralED at ed.gov <<mailto:RuralED at ed.gov>mailto:RuralED at ed.gov>.

>

>Statement from Secretary Spellings on Release of Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund

>Grants

>On December 7, U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings released the

>following statement applauding the release of $90 million in grant relief

>money from the Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund:

>"The announcement today by former Presidents Bush and Clinton exemplifies

>our nation's spirit of unity and compassion. Their generosity and

>dedication in establishing this fund has been more than matched by the

>overwhelming response of Americans, who have dug deep to help their

>neighbors in need. "Hurricane Katrina stripped the Gulf Coast region of

>even its most basic and essential services, shutting down hundreds of

>schools and displacing hundreds of thousands of students. One-third of the

>grant funds, $30 million, will go toward repairing or replacing buildings

>and equipment at institutions of higher learning. It will also support the

>faculty and staff who have seen their lives interrupted by the storm. We

>cannot allow the accumulated research and hard work of these fine teachers

>and scholars to be washed away. "The U.S. Department of Education

>continues to do its part as well. We are working with states and schools

>in the region and elsewhere to ensure a minimum of disruption for

>students. We've held roundtable meetings with education and mental health

>experts to help children and families recover. We established the

>Hurricane Help for Schools online clearinghouse, which enables Americans

>to match their donations to meet schools' most pressing needs. To date,

>more than 500 matches have been made. And President Bush has proposed an

>urgently needed education relief package, which we are eager to see

>Congress approve. "In this season of giving, the American people have sent

>a positive and powerful message to the world-our nation will come together

>in times of need."

>

>

>

>

>





More information about the Workplace mailing list