[Workplace 429] FW: [EnglishLanguage 678] Re: Curriculum, materials, ASSESSMENTBrian, Dr Donna J G djgbrian at utk.eduWed Sep 20 11:49:59 EDT 2006
ELL/Workplace cross post ________________________________ From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Heehee0617 at aol.com Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:41 AM To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov Subject: [EnglishLanguage 678] Re: Curriculum, materials, ASSESSMENT I agree with you Janet. I question how a standardized test can measure specific content related gains, particularly when these gains are expected to develop in a relatively short course of time. My time with my students is two hours a day, four days a week, for two and one-half months. If they pass the course, I wonder how much I truly prepared them for their next transition. Did they process some skills? Did they learn? That's why I try to differentiate my assessments, but I find many of my ESL adults to be very test-oriented. They believe numbers and grades determine how well they are learning. Alison Knowledge is the seed that exists in all of us. It is up to us to cultivate that seed. There is no such thing as a stupid seed. Just as there is no such thing as a stupid person. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/workplace/attachments/20060920/d063ae40/attachment.html
More information about the Workplace mailing list |