|
How do we know what to teach?
Reading instruction follows a developmental sequence from oral language
comprehension to the mastery of Print Skills (Alphabetics) to Silent Reading
Comprehension--from the parts to the whole. Ideally, instruction is carried
out with methods that research has shown to be effective.
Of course, the order
of acquisition of component skills is not absolutely linear; components
interact and the mastery of one often includes and is supported by ability
with another. For example, having a word in our listening vocabulary
(Word Meaning) helps with recognizing that word in print (Word Recognition).
Silent Reading Comprehension and Background Knowledge aid Fluency while
Oral Reading Rate has an effect on Silent Reading Comprehension.
ABE learners usually receive a Silent Reading Comprehension assessment
such as the TABE, ABLE, CASAS, or another test
when they first enroll. While such an assessment is necessary for an
approximate class placement--whether Beginner, Intermediate, or GED--it tells the teacher little about the learner's instructional needs.
Most often, it is up to classroom teachers to find out more about individual
learners in their classes. Assessing learners' mastery of reading
components is the first step in planning for their instruction. It just
stands to reason that it is difficult to fix something unless you know
what part is not functioning well, and you can't figure that out from
an assessment of the end product.
Suppose that in giving a Word
Analysis Inventory, a teacher finds out that some learners in an
Intermediate class have not mastered
to automaticity the pronunciation of vowel combinations oi
and au, pronouncing them instead according to the old refrain,
"when two vowels go walking, the first one does the talking and
says its own name." Here,then,is a lesson all set out for the teacher
that will take the learner a step further in mastering Word Analysis--that
is, if the lesson has been learned. Enter assessment once more,
and so the cycle continues: assess, t-e-a-c-h, assess, t-e-a-c-h,
assess... It isn't difficult to pinpoint instructional needs
within any of the reading components and then to get evidence that the
teaching has been effective.
Adults' reading development is most often uneven. Adults have had
literacy experiences and school-based reading instruction; they have
coped with the skills they have; they may have gained skill in one component
that has allowed them to partially compensate for and mask weaknesses
in others. On the following page, Comparison of Three Reading Profiles,
you will see how silent reading comprehension scores alone do not give an indication
of underlying weaknesses in other components that can be expected to
deter further progress.
Click
here to go to "Comparison of Three Reading Profiles" next.
|